SERIES SATURDAY: Sgt. Janus


This is a series about … well, series. I do so love stories that continue across volumes, in whatever form: linked short stories, novels, novellas, television, movies. I’ve already got a list of series I’ve recently read, re-read, watched, or re-watched that I plan to blog about. I might even, down the line, open myself up to letting other people suggest titles I should read/watch and then comment on.

Cover art by Jeffrey Ray Hayes

Cover art by Jeffrey Ray Hayes

 

While I’m not as well-read in the field as I’d like to be, I really do love the “occult detective” genre. There’s a long history to it, from the Victorian (Thomas Carnacki and Aylmer Vance) to the pulp (Jules deGrandin and John Thunstone) to the modern (Simon Feximal and John Constantine), and it has seeped from the written to the filmed (Carl Kolchak among others). Jim Beard’s Sgt. Roman Janus is an intriguing addition to the genre.

Janus has now appeared in three books: Sgt. Janus, Spirit-Breaker; Sgt. Janus Returns, and Sgt. Janus on the Dark Track. Flinch! Books has recently reissued the first two books as a precursor to their release of the third (and hopefully not final) book in the series. All three have beautifully painted new covers by Jeffrey Ray Hayes that capture the otherworldly nature of the characters.

As a character, Sgt. Janus fits the mold of the occult detectives who have preceded him into print: his personal background is shrouded in mystery (at least at the start), he’s a bit aloof, he doesn’t often explain fully what’s going on (and assumes, I think, that most people believe he’s up to shenanigans and the supernatural can’t possibly be real), and he does what he has to do regardless of personal cost.

What really makes the series stand out from the rest of the field is the way Beard tells Janus’ stories. He plays with genre conventions and delivers stories that feel daring and original within a pretty well-traveled realm.

One of the tropes of “consulting detective” fiction (both occult and not), dating back to the inestimable Sherlock Holmes, is the presence of a narrator who is also usually the detective’s aide-de-camp. Most detectives have their Watson, Parker, Caldwell, etc.. In Sgt. Janus, Spirit-Breaker, Beard replaces one reliable narrator with eight sometimes unreliable narrators. Each tale in the book is told by the client for whom Janus was working, part of his fee being that the client must send him a written description of how the case came to Janus’ attention and how it unfolded. This gives far more diversity to the way the stories are related – some of the clients are happy to be doing it and believe in Janus’ abilities, while some are disgruntled and imbue their stories with a healthy skepticism. This also allows Sgt. Janus himself to remain a mystery, his personal background and that of his female assistant and the house they occupy all only hinted at in the little tidbits he drops to his clients when they ask. And while each case stands alone, they also very clearly build on each other. The reader makes larger connections the characters themselves don’t, and the final story makes those connections as explicit as possible in revealing what it’s all been building towards.

The second book, Sgt. Janus Returns, follows the more traditional trope for narrators, introducing us to Joshua Hargreaves, a disaffected young man who meets an amnesiac woman who exhibits many of Sgt. Janus’ personality traits and abilities. Hargreaves becomes her aide-de-camp and chronicler while she tries to figure out who she is and why she feels connected to the house the missing Sgt. Janus used to occupy. Similar to the first volume, the stories herein are still episodic and still build towards a climax that reveals all – and in fact reveal a great deal more than the climactic story of the first book. Beard takes a huge chance by replacing his main character in the second book of the series – and it works. Perhaps it was because I read the books back-to-back-to-back, but I was invested in discovering “Lady Janus’s” secrets and how she was connected to Sgt. Janus from the very first page. I was also interested in Joshua Hargreaves’ development as a character – and he does have his own arc throughout the stories – as well as that of two new characters, Valerie Havelock-Mayer and Wendy Jackson.

The third book, Sgt. Janus on the Dark Track, breaks again with traditional by giving us a full novel instead of a series of connected short stories. It’s not really a spoiler to say Sgt. Roman Janus is back (although I won’t reveal how) on the case. It’s no secret that I love epistolary novels, and Beard proves to be a master of the form. The events of Sgt. Janus’ ride on a very dark train are told through the journal entries, telegrams, letters, and newspaper clippings of several different characters (although  notably once again, never in the words of Janus himself) including Valerie Havelock-Mayer and Joshua Hargreaves and another interesting new character, Gabriel Butters. Dark Track is the most blatantly Gothic of the three books so far, replete with young virginal damsel in distress and unknowable supernatural entity and locations of great supernatural power, and again it all works.

Three books with three different narratorial approaches should be highly annoying to a series reader. We like consistency in the way a series’ individual entries are told. But Beard’s experimentation and willingness to take risks keeps the series fresh and keeps the reader on their toes. I really hope there are more Sgt. Janus volumes forthcoming, and cannot wait to see what new ways Beard finds to tell the tales.

SERIES SATURDAY: The John Simon Thrillers

This is a series about … well, series. I do so love stories that continue across volumes, in whatever form: linked short stories, novels, novellas, television, movies. I’ve already got a list of series I’ve recently read, re-read, watched, or re-watched that I plan to blog about. I might even, down the line, open myself up to letting other people suggest titles I should read/watch and then comment on.

John Simon Thrillers cover banner.jpg

 

Part near-future science fiction, part buddy-cop comedy, part techno-thriller, part family drama: the John Simon Thrillers series by Bryan Thomas Schmidt is such a mash-up of genres that it really shouldn’t work – and yet it does, and pretty brilliantly at that. The series, which has three books so far (Simon Says, The Sideman, and Common Source) with at least two more in the works, focuses on property crimes police detective John Simon and his new partner, Lucas George.

John Simon is a middle-aged, sharp-humored, career detective with the Kansas City Police Department. He’s a bit of a Luddite when it comes to technology and a bit old-fashioned when it comes to his personal relationships, but he’s not quite the curmudgeon he claims he is. He’s devoted to his job and does it well. He’s devoted to being a father, but that’s a harder job in the aftermath of a divorce and his ex-wife’s bipolar diagnosis. And when, in the first book of the series, his partner on the job is killed, he’s devoted to bringing her killers to justice.

Lucas George is an android, one of the relatively new strain in this near-future Kansas City, who just wants to do his job as a night watchman, remain true to the Three Laws (in-world, Schmidt has the android creators follow in Asimov’s fictional footsteps), and be a good member of society. Being present at the bust-gone-wrong that eventually leads to Simon’s partner’s murder pulls Lucas into the action first as a witness, then as a civilian advisor, and by the start of the second book as a cop-in-training and Simon’s new partner.

The relationship between the two men is rocky at first, of course, the circumstances of their meeting being about as far from the definition of “meet-cute” as one can get. But smartly, Schmidt doesn’t drag it out: the “will they or won’t they be friends” subplot is wrapped up by the end of book one, and we get to watch the friendship grow and deepen over the next two books in the series. Lucas becomes Simon’s work partner and confidante and a “big brother” of sorts to Simon’s daughter Emma. Simon and Lucas’ banter is classic buddy-cop movie dialogue (Schmidt is not afraid to wear his influences on his sleeve), but not so over-the-top that it becomes grating or tiresome. The characters’ style of humor is different as well: Simon’s acerbic and dark, Lucas’s pun-filled and replete with movie quotes that sometimes are deployed at precisely the wrong time. Schmidt uses the humor to give the reader breathing space in what otherwise are fast-paced and tense narratives.

The first two books focus on Simon, Lucas, and crew stumbling onto, and then taking down, terrorist threats that feel extremely realistic given these books are set so close to our own time. The books are filled with cinematic car- and foot- (and even aerial) chases, the action enhanced by Schmidt’s deep knowledge of the Kansas City area as both a resident and as a ride-along with local police. In the third book, Common Source, the attention switches to a potential problem with the androids themselves, making it perhaps the most techno-thriller of the series so far.

Other than the presence of sentient androids, the technology of the series is very much near-future. The first book’s action hinges on black market nanotech and the third on the androids themselves, but Schmidt doesn’t project much beyond that. By setting the series in the late 2020s, he is able to keep firearms and cars and household security systems and phones and drones all pretty close to what we currently have. This enables Lucas (and when appropriate, his fellow androids) to stand out. And by having the androids be sentient as well as more capable than most humans, Schmidt sets up an on-going conversation about accepting differences and understanding the other. Lucas faces moments of anti-android prejudice in each book from a variety of quarters, not just the bad guys. Prior to Lucas joining the force, androids have been essentially a servant class. Some employers give them more free rein than others, but they’re still expected to do what they’re told when they’re told. While most of Simon’s fellow detectives and immediate bosses are welcoming of the new person in their midst, there are others in the KCPD who distrust the totally free android among them as well as those who feel themselves becoming obsolete in the presence of someone who can search for and analyze data quicker, run faster, communicate better. The condescension and growing prejudice towards androids, and Lucas and Simon’s reaction to it, is a central theme of the series. And the main characters are not the only ones who see it and act (or fail to act) on it. Simon’s teenage daughter Emma is central to the action of two of the books so far but present in all three, and it’s her bond with Lucas that helps Simon navigate this new partnership.

Simon and Lucas’ world is also filled with a fantastically diverse cast of supporting characters. Fellow cops come in a plethora of genders, sexualities, ethnicities, religious backgrounds and marital statuses (including a wonderful polyamorous grouping), as do the informants and civilians the leads encounter. These characters are more than just token window-dressing; they represent the real-life diverse make-up of Kansas City and most other major cities. Schmidt develops even the tertiary characters as full and complex personalities. The variety of personalities and physicalities among the cops reminds me of Barney Miller (in the lighter moments) and NYPD Blue (in the more serious moments, minus the gratuitous nudity), my two favorite cop shows.

But the books are not all precinct scenes and chases. Each book expands upon Simon’s family life. The tensions with his ex-wife are ever-present and Emma is becoming more and more aware of her mother’s problems and her father’s attempts to keep the peace. Simon is one of those divorcees who works very hard not to put the kid in the middle and even harder not to let his feelings about his ex-wife negatively influence Emma. The family scenes are worked organically into the mix and never feel like they are less important than the rest of the book.

Humor, action, real emotional content, characters who grow and change as the series progresses – I cannot recommend the John Simon Thrillers enough.

Guest Post: Bad Blood A Life Without Consequence

Today’s blog is a guest post by musician and author David B. Roundsley, who I interviewed as part of the Pride Month Interviews series.

Dave-Library-Sepia.jpg

 

Anthony has kindly given me this space to talk about my book (and album) Bad Blood. This started out to document my 13-year search for my birth parents and DNA origins but became so much more. Parts of my life I had pushed to the side came into focus, forcing me to examine areas previously left untouched. Being a gay man and an adoptee, other outside stats came into play. The suicide rate for adoptees is 7.6% as compared to 3.1% of children living with their biological families. The suicide rate for LGBTQ youth is an added 1.5-3% higher than heterosexual youth. Being an adoptee, I realized I was hired for a job I never applied for.

Prior to this search, which really became an adventure, had anyone asked if I had any doubts or questions about my life, I’d probably have said, “No.” Stumbling into this through good timing and chance, I realize now how many questions I actually had.

Dealing with issues of anxiety and depression, along with questions of identity and self-worth, started this search, but very quickly I was pulled down a rabbit hole to make Alice’s adventures seem tame. I had expected I’d find a father and mother who more likely than not were no longer together, but otherwise had relatively normal and unremarkable lives. Instead I discovered ties to the Mob, criminal behavior, drug use, promiscuity, swinging, and several generations of broken homes and families left in the dust.

Another aspect of the story, journey, and book I’ve been reluctant to talk about prior to publication is my older half-sister “Danni”. We were several years into the search when a twist of fate provided the singular breadcrumb that allowed us to find her. To say she’s had a Dickensian life would be a massive understatement. Despite the many trials she has been through, she is remarkably upbeat and one of the nicest and kindest people you could ever meet.

I worked with “Danni” (all the names in the book have been changed, with the exception of mine and my husband Dave’s) for several months last year so she could provide her first-person narrative, not only of her life, but also of my birth father’s family and origins. Her narrative gives an added dimension and opened the door for discoveries that would have otherwise been lost to time.

Finding the answers to a myriad of mysteries, the journey was healing both to myself and many other people. While the story seems unique, I believe with data aggregation, social media, DNA tests and so much of our lives now documented online, uncovering secrets and truth will become more commonplace.

 

Please check out my Kickstarter Campaign at: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/bad-blood/bad-blood-a-life-without-consequence

The Campaign ends at midnight September 11.

 

David B. Roundsley has been involved in a wide array of artistic disciplines ranging from fine art (painting, pen & ink, watercolor), to graphic design, multi-media, writing, video, and music (composing and studio production) over the past 50 years. He has run an independent design company since 1994 as well as having held the Creative Director positions at GetSmart and Fast Find, and has released 11 albums under the moniker Munich Syndrome.

SERIES SATURDAY: Stargirl TV series

This is a series about … well, series. I do so love stories that continue across volumes, in whatever form: linked short stories, novels, novellas, television, movies. I’ve already got a list of series I’ve recently read, re-read, watched, or re-watched that I plan to blog about. I might even, down the line, open myself up to letting other people suggest titles I should read/watch and then comment on.

Stargirl season 1 poster.jpg


I think that Stargirl has become my favorite of the current live-action super-hero television offerings. (This being said, as I’ve also noted on social media, in light of not having seen any of Doom Patrol, Titans, Swamp Thing or Umbrella Academy, and having fallen way behind on Black Lightning, Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., and Gotham.) So I’m here to talk about why in more depth than my Facebook post.  IN CASE IT NEEDS TO BE SAID – FROM THIS POINT ON, EXPECT SPOILERS! BOW OUT NOW IF YOU HAVEN’T WATCHED THE ENTIRE SEASON AND CARE ABOUT BEING SURPRISED!

I only became familiar with the Courtney Whitmore Stargirl character after her solo comics series had ended and she’d become a full member of the Justice Society of America. In fact, I still haven’t read her solo series, although I’ve picked up the trade paperback collections and mean to get around to them real soon. So my impressions of the show are based on what I know of the character from her appearances in various JSA runs, and on the show itself.

I’m a firm believer in not expecting live-action versions of comic books to hew too closely to the material on which they’re based. It’s less disappointing when they make wholesale changes if you just go in expecting there to be egregious differences. But StargirlStargirl seems intent on capturing the feel, if not the word-for-word storyline, of the comics. I don’t know how closely anything in season one maps onto the original Stargirl comics (other than Courtney’s step-dad being former sidekick Stripesy and building a giant robot) but they certainly seem to be embracing the legacy aspect of JSA comics going back to the 70s (when Robin, Power Girl, and a time-tossed Star-Spangled Kid joined the team). Okay, so this is not the Beth Chapel, Rick Tyler, Henry King Junior or Yolanda Montez I met back in the late 80s (most obviously, the show’s versions aren’t adults) … but they capture the spirit of each of those characters really well: Henry fighting his father’s evil influence, Rick trying to live up to his father’s legacy but still be his own man, Yolanda trying to decide if she even wants to do this superhero thing at all. Beth is the only one I feel doesn’t have much of the original comics version in her portrayal, but this version of the character is endearing and works as the brainier side of a very brawn-heavy team. I also wasn’t sure how I’d feel about the pilot episode’s biggest departure from the comics: killing off most of the JSA. I have to say I think they gave it all the poignancy it deserved, given that show is not about those characters, but rather the legacy they leave behind.

The show is also embracing the giddiness of super-hero fight scenes that many of the current CW shows eschew for more “realistic” (grittier, darker-filmed) fight choreography. It’s not unusual, in a Stargirl fight scene, to see a character get kicked in the chest and fly across the room. It’s also not unusual to actually be able to see who is hitting who and how hard, and what happens to them after they get hit. With the exception of the opening battle of the pilot, in which the Injustice Society kills most of the JSA, even the night-time and subterranean scenes are well-lit enough to see whose doing what. (Arrow’s fight choreography was mostly spectacular – but how often could you actually see the details of what was going on?) I loved pretty much every fight scene from the pilot on, but the fights in the finale had me cheering for just how well-done they were.

The costumes are also really faithful to the comics, and look almost nothing like what you’d find on any of the other Berlanti-led super-hero shows to date. Gone are the realistic heavy leather outfits of Arrow, Flash, etc.; in are cloaks and cowls and form-fitting spandex and outfits that shouldn’t work in real life but do anyway because COMIC BOOKS. It gives the show a more traditional comic-book look, which I think is part of what frees them to be a little over-the-top in the fight choreography. The only outfits I didn’t really like were those in the snapshot of Pat’s former team, the Seven Soldiers of Victory. They looked a little too much like Halloween costumes. Especially Shining Knight’s, which looked like something you’d pick up at a Ren Faire (but maybe I’m being picky on that because he’s one of my favorite super-heroes?).

The details in the costumes are matched by little set details throughout the season. I particularly loved the movies playing at the theater in Blue Valley: the Unknown Soldier, The Haunted Tank, GI Robot (get the feeling that the people of Blue Valley love their war movies?), and Prez. And I’m sure I missed some other easter eggs, because I can’t imagine Geoff Johns and James Robinson not throwing in more and more obscure stuff as production went along.

The acting on the show is top-notch. Brec Bassinger pulls off the neat trick of letting Courtney be pretty unlikeable at the start (she may be justified in being upset about the move to Blue Valley, but we don’t have to like the way she treats Pat or Mike) and even partway through the season (her grandstanding in the training session with “her” JSA) and still getting us to feel for her. Her best episode was the one in which she finds out her father isn’t who she thought he was and all of her insecurities and heartbreak tumble out. The actors playing the rest of the JSA are excellent as well; while some of what they’re given to play is standard “high school angst,” they don’t overplay it like a lot of high school-set shows do. Of the adult characters, I think Neil Jackson steals the show as Jordan Mahkent/Icicle – his character certainly shows the most depth and nuance (especially as compared to the very one-note “sadistic lunkhead” portrayals of Sportsmaster and Tigress), with Christopher James Baker’s Henry King/Brainwave a close second. And I have to give props to Nelson Lee, who spends the whole season acting under a hood through which we’re barely able to see even his eyes and yet sells every scene perfectly. Amy Smart is terrific as Courtney’s mother, and although I’m not a huge Luke Wilson fan I think he gets Pat Dugan’s mix of sincerity and insecurity just right.

I think the tightness of the season – 13 episodes – helped the actors as well. There was no room for one-off episodes exploring side-quests or a “day in the life at Blue Valley High.” Every scene needed to further the narrative or enhance character, and for the most part they did. Even the scenes of Mike Dugan’s school science fair were necessary – we had to care about the kid if we were going to worry about his safety in the finale. The only scenes I felt didn’t contribute to the overall arc were the scenes in the two-part finale focused on Isaac Bowin (The Fiddler’s son); if they’re not a set-up for the character having a bigger role in season two, then they really were extraneous.

The final episode was one of the most satisfying season finales I’ve seen in a long time, super-hero show or otherwise. The writing staff wrapped up all the major plots for the season while still giving us plenty of hooks into season two. And most of the finale was action, action, action. Which made the quieter Christmas scenes at the end more powerful.

But let’s talk about season two before we go.

With DC Universe and the decision to move most of the original live-action and animated content to HBO Max, there’s a lot of trepidation therefore that Stargirl moving to the CW instead will cause it to fall victim to the things that people dislike about the Arrowverse shows: increased romantic soap—opera elements and too many “filler” episodes, and a move to filming in Vancouver instead of Georgia. I’m hoping that Greg Berlanti will stick to the formula that made season one of Stargirl successful: 13 episodes (15, at most) and a focus on one major problem for the heroes to overcome (and that filming will remain in Georgia as Black Lightning has).

The concern I have is that the season finale set up a ton of possible main storylines for season two. We got set-ups for The Shade (one of my favorite DC characters ever), Eclipso, the search for the Seven Soldiers, the return of Sylvester Pemberton, the whereabouts/survival of the remaining ISA members who aren’t clearly dead, and perhaps even some who were … and left somewhat unspoken was what will happen when the ISA’s kids find out their parents are dead or incarcerated (we didn’t see Artemis Crock or Cameron Mahkent in any meaningful capacity in the season finale, but we did see Isaac Bowin take a tuba to a bully’s head) and who is responsible for those deaths/incarcerations. That’s a lot to juggle in a short 13-15 episode season. I’m afraid that the writers are going to try to go bigger in season two, which will not necessarily be better, and I’m hoping that this prolonged pandemic-induced hiatus will give Johns and company time to decide what story they want to tell in season two and what can wait until a probably season three or longer.

But even with that concern firmly in place, I’m excited and hopeful for a second season of Stargirl. It’s nice to see a brightly-lit, hopeful, less-angst-driven superhero show on television right now.