Happy Holidays!

This year’s Christmas poem is a repeat from 2012 because I thought we could all use a laugh:

I’m trying to write a Christmas song,

God, why is this so tough?

I have no musical talent and my rhyming’s kinda rough.

But it shouldn’t be so hard to string some words together,

Say something about Santa and stars or maybe sing about the weather.

(Let It Snow, Let It Snow, Let It Snow)

 

I could try to be serious this year, sing about some modern woe

Songs by Bing and Bowie and the Alarm cover that pretty well though.

I could sing about missing Christmas with the someone that I love

But I’m pretty sure another sad song would make you all give me a shove.

(I’ll Be Home for Christmas…)

 

Maybe I should sing of sleighs! Of reindeer or snowmen or drummer boys!

Or maybe I should scrap this thing and go buy the kids their toys.

I could sing of New Year’s Eve instead, of hopes for where next year will go,

Or of how it’s just another night. Oh wait, that’s been done by Barry Manilow.

(It’s just another New Year’s Eve…)

 

Where’s the romance of holidays, the falling in love on a sleigh?

Maybe that’s what I should sing about: being merry and gay!

That’s it! I’ll sit up all night long, wait for a cute Santa to come by

Or maybe an Elf (of Legolas’s kind), I’m a geeky kinda guy!

(I’mma be under the Mistletoe with you…)

 

May you have a rock-and-roll Christmas, or one that’s White or Green or Blue.

May you have Nights Holy and Silent, be it Hannukah, Kwanzaa, Solstice or Yule.

 

May the Love and Light of the season

Warm you and keep you safe.

 

Merry Christmas, 

Happy Hannukah,

Joyous New Year!

Series Saturday: the Philip Marlowe novels

This is a blog series about … well, series. I love stories that continue across volumes, in whatever form: linked short stories, novels, novellas, television, movies, comics.

Marlowe Cover Banner.png

 

In 2019, I realized after several conversations with my friend Dave (our conversations often lead to me identifying something I haven’t read or seen) that I had never read a Philip Marlowe novel (or likely anything else by Raymond Chandler). I mean, I knew who Marlowe was, and I knew Chandler’s influence on the mystery genre overall and noir in particular. So how was it that I could not recall every having read a single Marlowe book? It was time to fix that!

As with so many of the reading and/or viewing challenges I set myself, it took a while for this one to play out. I listened to the first Marlowe novel, The Big Sleep, in late 2019, and then decided to motivate myself by making the Marlowe books a part of my “Complete the Series” Challenge for 2020. I made a game start at the beginning of the year thanks to several long work trips with lots of driving, then dropped the ball until Noirvember when I read the final two books written or co-written by Chandler.

The long gap between the first six books and the final two influenced my experience of the series as a whole. Another influence was experiencing the series in three different forms. I listened to the first two novels narrated by Ray Porter. When I went to purchase book three, I discovered that it was not available with narration by Porter – nor were the rest of the books. That left me with either listening to abridged editions narrated by Elliot Gould or full-cast recording from the BBC starring Toby Stephens. As I really wanted to continue the experience of hearing Chandler’s actual words, I chose the Gould abridged editions. When it came time for book seven? Only the full-cast BBC version was available. I switched to print for the final two books, which partially explains the seven months gap as the last book (started by Chandler but completed after his death by Robert B. Parker) was harder to track down than I expected it to be.

Overall, I loved this series. So much of what Chandler did is consider trope now – but I believe he was the first to do it, or at least the first to do it well enough to influence others.

His characterization of Marlowe – world-weary, introspective, a bit of a horn-dog, chivalrous and chauvinistic in equal measure, aware of his own prejudices and not always able to stop himself from acting on them – set a standard for disgruntled, distrusting protagonists. And the characterization isn’t quite static. In some books, he’s far more introspective and fatalistic while in others he’s just cynical and snarky. (Okay, he’s snarky in every single book. It’s part of his charm.) The heaviest introspective moments, the moments that gave noir its enduring rep, seem to come in the second through fifth books. In the first book, Marlowe is thoughtful but not full-out depressing. In the later books, Marlowe seems to have mellowed a little. He’s still world-weary but he seems to have accepted it and ruminates less on it. Or at least, he spends fewer words ruminating on it.

Chandler’s formula was to have Marlowe take on a case that then connects to one or more other cases. I may be mistaken, but I don’t think he varied from that basic formula throughout the books (and it’s especially evident in the final book, Playback). Most of the time, he’s hired by someone rich who is condescending at best and occasionally downright hostile. And these rich folks usually get some kind of come-uppance even when they’re not the actual bad guy of the story. In terms of the mysteries, Chandler is usually good about providing the reader with enough hints of what’s going on that the reveal doesn’t come out of nowhere. Marlowe’s interactions with the police are always interesting and not always antagonistic (I’d say it’s about 50/50 over the series). It’s also sort of fun trying to figure who Marlowe is going to go to bed with and when (and occasionally even if – he doesn’t always let his hormones win over common sense).

One of the things that did surprise me was how few continuing supporting characters there are. I expected Marlowe’s former boss, introduced in the first book, to appear or at least be mentioned more than once. Likewise, some of the cops; I realize Los Angeles was a big city even in the 1940s and that some of the action rolls outside of LA proper (even down to San Diego and into Mexico), but we rarely see an officer of the law a second time. (Parker does bring one of them back in Poodle Springs, but I have to wonder if Chandler would have done so had he written more than four chapters before passing away). Nowadays, the idea of a detective character without a regular supporting cast, including a regular antagonist of some kind, is unthinkable. Then again, the idea of a series lead without a serious romantic interest is also unthinkable these days, and it’s only in the final three books that we see Marlowe make a serious commitment (even if we don’t realize he’s making the commitment until the end of Playback and the opening of Poodle Springs). I personally thought Anne Riordan from Farewell, My Lovely, had the makings of a perfect non-romantic Girl Friday and would have added a lot to later books.

So how did the various listening/reading formats affect my experience?

I really loved Ray Porter’s interpretation of the character, gruff-voiced but still relatable, and that set the tone for me. He plays with Chandler’s language the way someone who really enjoys lush descriptions does. He’s clearly invested in the role and having fun with it, and every word has appropriate weight. I really wish the entire run was available narrated by Porter (who has narrated a LOT of other stuff, and I’m never disappointed with his work when I get to listen to it).

Elliot Gould is well known for playing Marlowe in 1973’s film version of The Long Goodbye, and he’s a great reader who also really gets the character – but the abridged audiobooks feel rushed. There are no chapter breaks, the action running from one scene to another without the pause such breaks afford the reader. More than once I found myself confused because of contradictory back-to-back statements (it’s midnight, and then suddenly it’s noon, for instance) that a simple intonation of “Chapter Six,” or even a ten second pause, would have broken up. My theory, which I haven’t checked, is that the Gould-narrated books (including the first two, which I didn’t listen to) were recorded at a time when audiobooks were on cassette (and the more cassettes a publisher had to produce, the higher the price) or early CDs (when the discs couldn’t hold as much data as they do now). Then there’s the fact that they’re advertised as “abridged,” which means something deemed inconsequential by someone was removed to make the narration fit into the allotted cassette or CD space. I’m still wondering what I missed by not just reading the actual novels of these five books.

Reading, instead of listening to, Playback and Poodle Springs allowed me to merge the best parts of Porter and Gould’s performances in my head. Although thanks to the cover art on Playback my mental image of Marlowe was Robert Mitchum. (It’s not Mitchum on the cover – it just looks a lot like him.) It felt appropriate to be in the home stretch with Marlowe on my own, turning yellowed pages (one paperback, one hardcover, both from used bookstores) and savoring Chandler’s descriptions of places and people.

I can imagine rereading the entire series one day, especially because I’ll always have that nagging question of what the abridged audiobooks cut out. But for now, I’m glad I finished this challenge this year!

The Marlowe Books, in order, are:

·       The Big Sleep (1939)

·       Farewell, My Lovely (1940)

·       The High Window (1942)

·       The Lady in the Lake (1943)

·       The Little Sister (1949)

·       The Long Goodbye (1953)

·       Playback (1958)

·       Poodle Springs (unfinished by Chandler at his death in 1959; completed by Robert B. Parker in 1989)

Parker did write another sequel completely on his own, which I decided not to include in this particular challenge. And there have been several other Marlowe prequels and sequels in the past few years that sound like they might be worth seeking out.

Series Saturday: Monsterland

This is a blog series about … well, series. I love stories that continue across volumes, in whatever form: linked short stories, novels, novellas, television, movies, comics.

monsterland logo.png

 

Monsterland

1 season (so far), eight episodes

Annapurna Television, Two & Two Pictures

Hulu, 2020

 

Synopsis: (from the IMDb page) Encounters with Gothic beasts, including fallen angels and werewolves, broken people are driven to desperate acts in an attempt to repair their lives, ultimately showing there is a thin line between man and beast.

 

My Thoughts: Monsterland, an episodic anthology show with a horror bent, debuted on Hulu in October 2020. Based partially on Nathan Ballingrud’s fantastic short story collection North American Lake Monsters (reissued under the title Monsterland to coincide with the show), the show is more psychological horror than slasher flick or fantasy horror. Which isn’t a bad thing – but may surprise some viewers expecting more traditional horror from the series description.

 

Tonally, Monsterland feels like the horror equivalent of the few Black Mirror episodes I’ve seen. Episodes are claustrophobic and weather-beaten (in a good way to this viewer). Close-ups of characters, tight two-shots, and slightly-out-of-focus backgrounds in wider shots contribute to the claustrophobic “it’s just the viewer and the character” tone; for many of these episodes I really felt like I was in the room/environs with the characters. Regional climates saturate every episode: the humidity of Port Fourchon and New Orleans, the winter chill of Eugene Oregon and Newark New Jersey, the stark cold of backwoods Iron River Michigan, and the salt-air wet of Palacios Texas are as much as a character as the humans who populate the stories set there. Likewise, the man-made suburban false security of Plainfield Illinois and the tightly spaced urban modernity of New York, New York take a toll on the characters in those episodes.

Although the series is, as mentioned, nominally adapted from Nathan Ballingrud’s short stories, several episodes are original to the series. To help make them feel of a whole, episode titles are simply the city and state where the story takes place. This also contributes to the overall series concept that monsters can be found anywhere, from the rural to the urban.

And that’s really the thematic connective tissue of the series: that as much as it would be nice to think monsters are supernatural and fully evil, the truth is any one of us has the potential to be a monster to someone or something. People are selfish. People are manipulative. People make bad decisions which have greater impacts than they realize in the moment. Some of those decisions are made intentionally, some inadvertently. Some results are immediate, some take years to echo out. But ultimately, these are stories about how horrible people can be to each other and to the environment.

The “actual” monsters presented are often incidental – or at least are the inciting incident rather than the point of the episode. Meeting a shape-changing serial killer in Port Fourchon sets Toni on a path she can’t come back from; a demon in New Orleans forces Annie to see what she’s been hiding from herself for over a decade; a shadow-being exposes an already down-trodden teen in Eugene to the controlling vitriol of online conspiracy theorists; urban legends about haunted woods alter the life course of three teens in Iron River; fallen angel-like beings in Newark skirt the periphery of Brian and Amy’s personal tragedy . There are a few episodes where the supernatural element is more prevalent and central to the narrative, however: an encounter with a mermaid helps an injured Palacios fisherman reclaim his sense of self-worth, a religious epiphany emotionally and physically impregnates a New York oil executive, and a lesbian couple in Plainfield face a very real case of life-after-death.

There is a bit of lip-service paid to these episodes taking place in the same world: Kaitlyn Dever’s Toni appears in several episodes under different aliases, the oil spill at the heart of the New York episode is background to the Palacios Texas episode, and I think a couple of other background characters turn up or are mentioned more than once. It all felt a bit unnecessary. Anthology shows like this don’t really need to have recurring characters shuffling through the background except for the writers/directors to give a little wink-wink to the viewers. Had the recurring appearances of Toni led somewhere (perhaps in a potential season two?), I might have felt differently.

The performances of the leads in each episode are roundly excellent. Full credit to Kaitlyn Dever, Nicole Beharie, Kelly Marie Tran, Mike Cotton and Adepero Oduye, Trieu Tran, Taylor Schilling and Roberta Colindrez, Charlie Tahan and Ben Rappaport, Bill Camp and Michael Hsu Rosen. The supporting casts of each episode are also solid, but the intimate focus of each episode puts the burden of the story on the one or two leads, even in party scenes.

It should be noted that a few of these episodes touch heavily on topics that may be emotional triggers for people who have gone through similar struggles. I’m thinking in particular of the “Plainfield, Illinois” episode, which hinges heavily on a not-particularly nuanced portrayal of bipolar disorder and depression. It was a hard episode for me to watch, and I’m “only” depressed, not bipolar. Other episodes deal with child molestation, child abandonment, and child disappearances.

I don’t believe a second season pick-up has been announced, but I am hoping for more of Monsterland, including more direct adaptations of Ballingrud’s short stories.